5011059f5d
Architecture specs, benchmarks, gotchas, Ollama settings, tool calling format, and implementation patterns from Simon and AI_Visualizer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
195 lines
7.0 KiB
Markdown
195 lines
7.0 KiB
Markdown
# Gemma 4 Synthesis — How to Build With It
|
|
|
|
> Opinionated guide based on two production implementations and ongoing use.
|
|
> Seth Freiberg, 2026-04-12
|
|
|
|
## The One-Paragraph Summary
|
|
|
|
Gemma 4 is an ultra-compliant, highly-capable model that doesn't know who it is. It doesn't need hand-holding on tasks but needs explicit instructions in the system prompt about identity, boundaries, and output format. It needs `num_predict` increased (Ollama defaults are absurdly low), `think` set to false (thinking eats the context budget), and `format: json` avoided entirely (causes infinite loops). Due to its fast speed and free local inference, sequential tool calls are the ideal solution to tasks that would otherwise require long structured output.
|
|
|
|
## Mental Model
|
|
|
|
Think of Gemma 4 as a very competent employee on their first day. They can do the work — you don't need to explain how. But you DO need to explain:
|
|
- Who they are and what their job is
|
|
- What they should and should NOT do
|
|
- Exactly what format you want the deliverable in
|
|
- The boundaries of their role
|
|
|
|
Get those right and Gemma 4 just works. Get them wrong and you get a generic chatbot.
|
|
|
|
## Mandatory Ollama Settings
|
|
|
|
Every Gemma 4 call MUST include:
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"think": false,
|
|
"options": {
|
|
"num_ctx": 4096,
|
|
"num_predict": 2048
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Why each one:**
|
|
- `think: false` — Ollama 0.20+ defaults to think:true. Thinking tokens consume num_predict budget invisibly, returning empty responses. Seth has ONLY had success with thinking off.
|
|
- `num_ctx: 4096+` — Ollama defaults to 2048. Your system prompt alone might exceed that.
|
|
- `num_predict: 2048+` — Ollama defaults to 128. Any structured output gets truncated.
|
|
|
|
Scale these to your task. The values above are safe minimums, not recommendations.
|
|
|
|
## System Prompt Template
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
You are [NAME], a [ROLE DESCRIPTION].
|
|
|
|
## What You Do
|
|
- [Explicit list of responsibilities]
|
|
- [Tools you have access to and when to use each one]
|
|
|
|
## What You Do NOT Do
|
|
- [Explicit list of things to refuse or avoid]
|
|
- [Common mistakes to prevent]
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
[Exact schema, field names, example if complex]
|
|
Respond with ONLY [format]. No prose outside the [format].
|
|
|
|
## Rules
|
|
- [Behavioral constraints]
|
|
- [Multi-step chaining instructions if using tools]
|
|
|
|
Today's date: [DATE]
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Key principles:**
|
|
1. Identity first — who is this agent?
|
|
2. Positive instructions before negative (what TO do before what NOT to do)
|
|
3. Output format is explicit and complete — Gemma 4 follows schemas faithfully
|
|
4. "No prose outside the JSON" prevents wrapper text that breaks parsing
|
|
5. Date injection helps with temporal reasoning
|
|
|
|
## Tool Calling Strategy
|
|
|
|
Gemma 4 is **reliable for tool calling** but **weak at structuring long JSONs**.
|
|
|
|
### When to use tool calling (Ollama native)
|
|
- Multi-turn agents with 2-10 tools
|
|
- Sequential reasoning chains (lookup A -> use A to decide B -> lookup B)
|
|
- Any task where the model needs to gather information before responding
|
|
|
|
### When to use prompt-based JSON instead
|
|
- Single-turn generation with known output structure
|
|
- When you need specific JSON schema control
|
|
- When the output is a payload (prompts, configs) not a conversation
|
|
|
|
### The Sequential Pattern
|
|
|
|
Instead of asking Gemma 4 to produce one massive JSON:
|
|
```
|
|
BAD: "Generate a 50-scene storyboard as JSON" -> truncated/malformed
|
|
GOOD: "Generate scenes 1-5 as JSON" x10 -> reliable every time
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Gemma 4's inference speed makes sequential calls cheap. A 10-call chain at ~134 tok/s on a 3090 Ti costs seconds, not minutes. This is the fundamental advantage of local models — latency is predictable and network-free.
|
|
|
|
## JSON Extraction Pattern
|
|
|
|
Since `format: "json"` is broken, always extract client-side:
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
# Python
|
|
import json
|
|
raw = response["response"]
|
|
start = raw.find("{")
|
|
end = raw.rfind("}")
|
|
if start >= 0 and end > start:
|
|
obj = json.loads(raw[start:end + 1])
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
```javascript
|
|
// JavaScript
|
|
const raw = response.message.content;
|
|
const match = raw.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
|
|
if (match) obj = JSON.parse(match[0]);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
For arrays, find `[` and `]` instead. Add json5 fallback for trailing commas.
|
|
|
|
## Temperature Guidelines
|
|
|
|
| Task Type | Temperature | Why |
|
|
|-----------|-------------|-----|
|
|
| Evaluation / scoring | 0.2 | Consistent, reproducible judgments |
|
|
| Structured extraction | 0.3-0.4 | Faithful to schema |
|
|
| Creative generation | 0.6-0.8 | Variety without chaos |
|
|
| Conversation / chat | 0.7-1.0 | Natural feel |
|
|
|
|
Retry strategy: bump temp +0.1 per retry to escape format failures.
|
|
|
|
## Vision Usage
|
|
|
|
**Works for:** Describing image contents (objects, colors, composition, text)
|
|
**Unreliable for:** Subjective quality scoring, aesthetic judgment
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
import base64
|
|
with open("image.png", "rb") as f:
|
|
b64 = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode("ascii")
|
|
|
|
response = client.generate(
|
|
model="gemma4:26b",
|
|
prompt="Describe this image in detail.",
|
|
images=[b64],
|
|
think=False,
|
|
options={"temperature": 0.2, "num_predict": 512}
|
|
)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Vision is on ALL Gemma 4 variants (E2B, E4B, 26B, 31B). Audio is E-series only.
|
|
|
|
## Context Management
|
|
|
|
### Multi-turn (chat agents)
|
|
- Prune old tool results and tool-call messages
|
|
- Keep assistant's natural-language summaries
|
|
- Set num_ctx to 32768 for rich conversations
|
|
- Set a tool iteration limit (12 is proven) with streaming fallback
|
|
|
|
### Single-turn (pipeline stages)
|
|
- Calculate your prompt size and set num_ctx accordingly
|
|
- For long inputs (full track analysis), use recursive splitting at natural boundaries
|
|
- Pin model with `keep_alive=-1` if pipeline has idle gaps
|
|
|
|
## Model Selection
|
|
|
|
| Use Case | Recommended | Why |
|
|
|----------|------------|-----|
|
|
| Production pipeline (needs GPU coexistence) | `gemma4:26b` | Best quality/speed/VRAM balance |
|
|
| On-device / edge | `gemma4:e4b-it-q8_0` | 12GB VRAM, vision+audio |
|
|
| Maximum quality (single-model GPU) | `gemma4:31b-it-q4_K_M` | Sharpest but slow under memory pressure |
|
|
| Rapid prototyping / testing | `gemma4:26b` | Fast enough for interactive dev |
|
|
|
|
## Anti-Patterns
|
|
|
|
1. **Don't use `format: "json"`** — infinite loops on nested schemas
|
|
2. **Don't leave `think` at default** — eats your output budget silently
|
|
3. **Don't leave `num_predict` at default** — 128 tokens is nothing
|
|
4. **Don't leave `num_ctx` at default** — 2048 truncates most prompts
|
|
5. **Don't ask for huge JSON in one call** — break into sequential calls
|
|
6. **Don't use thinking mode for evaluation** — inflates scores, wastes context
|
|
7. **Don't skip system prompt identity** — Gemma 4 becomes a generic chatbot
|
|
8. **Don't use audio on 26B/31B** — only E-series has audio encoder
|
|
|
|
## Quick-Start Checklist
|
|
|
|
- [ ] Set `think: false`
|
|
- [ ] Set `num_predict` >= 512 (2048+ for JSON output)
|
|
- [ ] Set `num_ctx` >= 4096 (scale to your prompt size)
|
|
- [ ] Write explicit system prompt with identity + boundaries + output format
|
|
- [ ] Extract JSON client-side (no `format: "json"`)
|
|
- [ ] Set `keep_alive` >= 30m (or pin with -1)
|
|
- [ ] For long structured output, use sequential calls
|
|
- [ ] For vision, pass base64 in `images` array
|
|
- [ ] Test with your actual prompt length — Ollama won't warn about truncation
|