Files
gemma4-research/SYNTHESIS.md
T
Mortdecai c61394923c fix: walk back round-1/2 conclusions — the cause was think=false all along
Seth asked "was this with think=false?" Yes — and that was the only
question that mattered. Everything I concluded in round 1 and round 2
was wrong.

Actual cause, isolated in round 3:
- At identical message state, gemma4:26b with think=false returns
  eval=4 (silent stop); with think unset or think=true, returns
  eval=165 and emits the correct tool call.
- Original round-1 write_file harness + think unset: 26B passes in
  8 iters, 20s. No mitigations needed.
- 31B dense and qwen3-coder:30b tolerate think=false; 26B MoE does not.

Red herrings (kept on-record in the bakeoff doc, not silently erased):
- Round 1: "write_file tool-call argument size" — wrong
- Round 2a: refuted the arg-size theory but for the wrong reason
  (still failed because think=false was still set)
- Round 2b: "cumulative tool-response context size" — truncating
  did make 26B pass, but by coincidence. Shorter context at the
  decision turn dodged the think=false side effect.

Why the existing "always think:false" guidance was misleading:
it was derived from AI_Visualizer (single-turn JSON pipelines) where
thinking tokens do eat num_predict invisibly. In multi-turn
tool-calling agents the channels are separate and the flag has a
different effect — catastrophic on 26B specifically.

Doc updates:
- GOTCHAS: replaced the 26B entry with the actual cause; scoped the
  original "Thinking Mode Eats Context" entry to single-turn pipelines
- SYNTHESIS: split the "Mandatory Ollama Settings" block into
  single-turn vs multi-turn variants; updated anti-patterns and
  quick-start checklist
- CORPUS_cli_coding_agent.md: revised pointer and config template
- docs/reference/bakeoff-2026-04-18.md: added Round 3 section with
  the correction notice at the top of the file and full diagnostic
  methodology

New artifacts: harness_no_think_flag.py, harness_write_no_think.py,
and 4 new log files demonstrating all three models pass when think
is left at default.
2026-04-18 18:14:05 -04:00

224 lines
8.9 KiB
Markdown

# Gemma 4 Synthesis — How to Build With It
> Opinionated guide based on two production implementations and ongoing use.
> Seth Freiberg, 2026-04-12
## The One-Paragraph Summary
Gemma 4 is an ultra-compliant, highly-capable model that doesn't know who it is. It doesn't need hand-holding on tasks but needs explicit instructions in the system prompt about identity, boundaries, and output format. It needs `num_predict` increased (Ollama defaults are absurdly low), `think` set to false (thinking eats the context budget), and `format: json` avoided entirely (causes infinite loops). Due to its fast speed and free local inference, sequential tool calls are the ideal solution to tasks that would otherwise require long structured output.
> **For canonical upstream source (model cards, chat templates, serving commands,
> fine-tuning recipes, specialized siblings like EmbeddingGemma/ShieldGemma): see
> `tooling/README.md`.** That directory is 147 files / 14 MB of first-party material
> pulled from Google / Hugging Face / framework maintainers. This SYNTHESIS is the
> opinionated digest; `tooling/` is the receipts.
## Mental Model
Think of Gemma 4 as a very competent employee on their first day. They can do the work — you don't need to explain how. But you DO need to explain:
- Who they are and what their job is
- What they should and should NOT do
- Exactly what format you want the deliverable in
- The boundaries of their role
Get those right and Gemma 4 just works. Get them wrong and you get a generic chatbot.
## Mandatory Ollama Settings
### For single-turn pipelines (AI_Visualizer shape)
Every Gemma 4 call MUST include:
```json
{
"think": false,
"options": {
"num_ctx": 4096,
"num_predict": 2048
}
}
```
**Why each one:**
- `think: false` — Ollama 0.20+ defaults to think:true. In single-turn JSON pipelines, thinking tokens consume num_predict budget invisibly, returning empty responses.
- `num_ctx: 4096+` — Ollama defaults to 2048. Your system prompt alone might exceed that.
- `num_predict: 2048+` — Ollama defaults to 128. Any structured output gets truncated.
Scale these to your task. The values above are safe minimums, not recommendations.
### For multi-turn tool-calling agents (Simon / CLI-coding-agent shape)
**Do NOT set `think: false`.** Leave it unset (Ollama default) or `true`.
```json
{
"options": {
"num_ctx": 32768,
"num_predict": 4096
}
}
```
Verified 2026-04-18 that `think: false` silently breaks `gemma4:26b` in multi-turn
tool-calling loops — model silent-stops with `eval_count=4` at tool-decision turns.
31B Dense and Qwen3-Coder tolerate the flag; 26B MoE does not. See `GOTCHAS.md`
§ "`think: false` Kills Gemma 4 26B in Multi-Turn Tool-Calling Loops" and
`docs/reference/bakeoff-2026-04-18.md` § "Round 3".
## System Prompt Template
```
You are [NAME], a [ROLE DESCRIPTION].
## What You Do
- [Explicit list of responsibilities]
- [Tools you have access to and when to use each one]
## What You Do NOT Do
- [Explicit list of things to refuse or avoid]
- [Common mistakes to prevent]
## Output Format
[Exact schema, field names, example if complex]
Respond with ONLY [format]. No prose outside the [format].
## Rules
- [Behavioral constraints]
- [Multi-step chaining instructions if using tools]
Today's date: [DATE]
```
**Key principles:**
1. Identity first — who is this agent?
2. Positive instructions before negative (what TO do before what NOT to do)
3. Output format is explicit and complete — Gemma 4 follows schemas faithfully
4. "No prose outside the JSON" prevents wrapper text that breaks parsing
5. Date injection helps with temporal reasoning
## Tool Calling Strategy
Gemma 4 is **reliable for tool calling** but **weak at structuring long JSONs**.
### When to use tool calling (Ollama native)
- Multi-turn agents with 2-10 tools
- Sequential reasoning chains (lookup A -> use A to decide B -> lookup B)
- Any task where the model needs to gather information before responding
### When to use prompt-based JSON instead
- Single-turn generation with known output structure
- When you need specific JSON schema control
- When the output is a payload (prompts, configs) not a conversation
### The Sequential Pattern
Instead of asking Gemma 4 to produce one massive JSON:
```
BAD: "Generate a 50-scene storyboard as JSON" -> truncated/malformed
GOOD: "Generate scenes 1-5 as JSON" x10 -> reliable every time
```
Gemma 4's inference speed makes sequential calls cheap. A 10-call chain at ~134 tok/s on a 3090 Ti costs seconds, not minutes. This is the fundamental advantage of local models — latency is predictable and network-free.
## JSON Extraction Pattern
Since `format: "json"` is broken, always extract client-side:
```python
# Python
import json
raw = response["response"]
start = raw.find("{")
end = raw.rfind("}")
if start >= 0 and end > start:
obj = json.loads(raw[start:end + 1])
```
```javascript
// JavaScript
const raw = response.message.content;
const match = raw.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
if (match) obj = JSON.parse(match[0]);
```
For arrays, find `[` and `]` instead. Add json5 fallback for trailing commas.
## Temperature Guidelines
| Task Type | Temperature | Why |
|-----------|-------------|-----|
| Evaluation / scoring | 0.2 | Consistent, reproducible judgments |
| Structured extraction | 0.3-0.4 | Faithful to schema |
| Creative generation | 0.6-0.8 | Variety without chaos |
| Conversation / chat | 0.7-1.0 | Natural feel |
Retry strategy: bump temp +0.1 per retry to escape format failures.
## Vision Usage
**Works for:** Describing image contents (objects, colors, composition, text)
**Unreliable for:** Subjective quality scoring, aesthetic judgment
```python
import base64
with open("image.png", "rb") as f:
b64 = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode("ascii")
response = client.generate(
model="gemma4:26b",
prompt="Describe this image in detail.",
images=[b64],
think=False,
options={"temperature": 0.2, "num_predict": 512}
)
```
Vision is on ALL Gemma 4 variants (E2B, E4B, 26B, 31B). Audio is E-series only.
## Context Management
### Multi-turn (chat agents)
- Prune old tool results and tool-call messages
- Keep assistant's natural-language summaries
- Set num_ctx to 32768 for rich conversations
- Set a tool iteration limit (12 is proven) with streaming fallback
### Single-turn (pipeline stages)
- Calculate your prompt size and set num_ctx accordingly
- For long inputs (full track analysis), use recursive splitting at natural boundaries
- Pin model with `keep_alive=-1` if pipeline has idle gaps
## Model Selection
| Use Case | Recommended | Why |
|----------|------------|-----|
| Production pipeline (needs GPU coexistence) | `gemma4:26b` | MoE (3.8B active), fast, good quality/VRAM balance |
| On-device / edge | `gemma4:e4b-it-q8_0` | 12GB VRAM, vision+audio (audio via llama.cpp only) |
| Maximum quality (single-model GPU) | `gemma4:31b-it-q4_K_M` | Dense 31B, sharpest but 5x slower, more VRAM pressure |
| Rapid prototyping / testing | `gemma4:26b` | Fast enough for interactive dev |
| Retrieval / embeddings | `embeddinggemma` (308M, separate model) | Gemma 4 has no embedding mode; use the sibling |
| CLI coding agent (openclaw / open code / pi / hermes / aider) | `gemma4:26b` (fastest) or `gemma4:31b-it-q4_K_M` (more headroom), either works — **just do not set `think: false` in the payload** | 2026-04-18 bakeoff on 3090 Ti: all three models (including Qwen3-Coder 30B) pass the same task in 8-14 iters. The only real gotcha is `think: false` silently breaks 26B in multi-turn loops. See `CORPUS_cli_coding_agent.md` + `docs/reference/bakeoff-2026-04-18.md` |
## Anti-Patterns
1. **Don't use `format: "json"`** — infinite loops on nested schemas
2. **For single-turn pipelines, don't leave `think` at default** — eats your output budget silently. **For multi-turn tool-calling agents, don't SET `think: false`** — silent-stops 26B. See the two "Mandatory Ollama Settings" sections above.
3. **Don't leave `num_predict` at default** — 128 tokens is nothing
4. **Don't leave `num_ctx` at default** — 2048 truncates most prompts
5. **Don't ask for huge JSON in one call** — break into sequential calls
6. **Don't use thinking mode for evaluation** — inflates scores, wastes context
7. **Don't skip system prompt identity** — Gemma 4 becomes a generic chatbot
8. **Don't use audio on 26B/31B** — only E-series has audio encoder
## Quick-Start Checklist
- [ ] Set `think: false` **for single-turn pipelines only**. Leave unset for multi-turn tool-calling agents (silent-stops 26B).
- [ ] Set `num_predict` >= 512 (2048+ for JSON output)
- [ ] Set `num_ctx` >= 4096 (scale to your prompt size)
- [ ] Write explicit system prompt with identity + boundaries + output format
- [ ] Extract JSON client-side (no `format: "json"`)
- [ ] Set `keep_alive` >= 30m (or pin with -1)
- [ ] For long structured output, use sequential calls
- [ ] For vision, pass base64 in `images` array
- [ ] Test with your actual prompt length — Ollama won't warn about truncation