Fills the gap between existing chat-agent (Simon) and pipeline (AI_Visualizer) patterns. Covers openclaw/open code/pi/hermes first-party agents from the HF launch blog, honest positioning vs qwen3-coder:30b, CLI-agent-specific gotchas (safety filter on security code, long-JSON weakness, no code exec), and a concrete homelab bakeoff plan pointed at CT 166 openclaw2 → CT 105 Ollama on pve197. Key research finding: Google published LiveCodeBench + Codeforces but NOT SWE-bench or Aider polyglot. The "autonomous agents" claim is plausible but unproven for multi-file repo-scale coding specifically.
7.8 KiB
Gemma 4 Synthesis — How to Build With It
Opinionated guide based on two production implementations and ongoing use. Seth Freiberg, 2026-04-12
The One-Paragraph Summary
Gemma 4 is an ultra-compliant, highly-capable model that doesn't know who it is. It doesn't need hand-holding on tasks but needs explicit instructions in the system prompt about identity, boundaries, and output format. It needs num_predict increased (Ollama defaults are absurdly low), think set to false (thinking eats the context budget), and format: json avoided entirely (causes infinite loops). Due to its fast speed and free local inference, sequential tool calls are the ideal solution to tasks that would otherwise require long structured output.
For canonical upstream source (model cards, chat templates, serving commands, fine-tuning recipes, specialized siblings like EmbeddingGemma/ShieldGemma): see
tooling/README.md. That directory is 147 files / 14 MB of first-party material pulled from Google / Hugging Face / framework maintainers. This SYNTHESIS is the opinionated digest;tooling/is the receipts.
Mental Model
Think of Gemma 4 as a very competent employee on their first day. They can do the work — you don't need to explain how. But you DO need to explain:
- Who they are and what their job is
- What they should and should NOT do
- Exactly what format you want the deliverable in
- The boundaries of their role
Get those right and Gemma 4 just works. Get them wrong and you get a generic chatbot.
Mandatory Ollama Settings
Every Gemma 4 call MUST include:
{
"think": false,
"options": {
"num_ctx": 4096,
"num_predict": 2048
}
}
Why each one:
think: false— Ollama 0.20+ defaults to think:true. Thinking tokens consume num_predict budget invisibly, returning empty responses. Seth has ONLY had success with thinking off.num_ctx: 4096+— Ollama defaults to 2048. Your system prompt alone might exceed that.num_predict: 2048+— Ollama defaults to 128. Any structured output gets truncated.
Scale these to your task. The values above are safe minimums, not recommendations.
System Prompt Template
You are [NAME], a [ROLE DESCRIPTION].
## What You Do
- [Explicit list of responsibilities]
- [Tools you have access to and when to use each one]
## What You Do NOT Do
- [Explicit list of things to refuse or avoid]
- [Common mistakes to prevent]
## Output Format
[Exact schema, field names, example if complex]
Respond with ONLY [format]. No prose outside the [format].
## Rules
- [Behavioral constraints]
- [Multi-step chaining instructions if using tools]
Today's date: [DATE]
Key principles:
- Identity first — who is this agent?
- Positive instructions before negative (what TO do before what NOT to do)
- Output format is explicit and complete — Gemma 4 follows schemas faithfully
- "No prose outside the JSON" prevents wrapper text that breaks parsing
- Date injection helps with temporal reasoning
Tool Calling Strategy
Gemma 4 is reliable for tool calling but weak at structuring long JSONs.
When to use tool calling (Ollama native)
- Multi-turn agents with 2-10 tools
- Sequential reasoning chains (lookup A -> use A to decide B -> lookup B)
- Any task where the model needs to gather information before responding
When to use prompt-based JSON instead
- Single-turn generation with known output structure
- When you need specific JSON schema control
- When the output is a payload (prompts, configs) not a conversation
The Sequential Pattern
Instead of asking Gemma 4 to produce one massive JSON:
BAD: "Generate a 50-scene storyboard as JSON" -> truncated/malformed
GOOD: "Generate scenes 1-5 as JSON" x10 -> reliable every time
Gemma 4's inference speed makes sequential calls cheap. A 10-call chain at ~134 tok/s on a 3090 Ti costs seconds, not minutes. This is the fundamental advantage of local models — latency is predictable and network-free.
JSON Extraction Pattern
Since format: "json" is broken, always extract client-side:
# Python
import json
raw = response["response"]
start = raw.find("{")
end = raw.rfind("}")
if start >= 0 and end > start:
obj = json.loads(raw[start:end + 1])
// JavaScript
const raw = response.message.content;
const match = raw.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
if (match) obj = JSON.parse(match[0]);
For arrays, find [ and ] instead. Add json5 fallback for trailing commas.
Temperature Guidelines
| Task Type | Temperature | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation / scoring | 0.2 | Consistent, reproducible judgments |
| Structured extraction | 0.3-0.4 | Faithful to schema |
| Creative generation | 0.6-0.8 | Variety without chaos |
| Conversation / chat | 0.7-1.0 | Natural feel |
Retry strategy: bump temp +0.1 per retry to escape format failures.
Vision Usage
Works for: Describing image contents (objects, colors, composition, text) Unreliable for: Subjective quality scoring, aesthetic judgment
import base64
with open("image.png", "rb") as f:
b64 = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode("ascii")
response = client.generate(
model="gemma4:26b",
prompt="Describe this image in detail.",
images=[b64],
think=False,
options={"temperature": 0.2, "num_predict": 512}
)
Vision is on ALL Gemma 4 variants (E2B, E4B, 26B, 31B). Audio is E-series only.
Context Management
Multi-turn (chat agents)
- Prune old tool results and tool-call messages
- Keep assistant's natural-language summaries
- Set num_ctx to 32768 for rich conversations
- Set a tool iteration limit (12 is proven) with streaming fallback
Single-turn (pipeline stages)
- Calculate your prompt size and set num_ctx accordingly
- For long inputs (full track analysis), use recursive splitting at natural boundaries
- Pin model with
keep_alive=-1if pipeline has idle gaps
Model Selection
| Use Case | Recommended | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Production pipeline (needs GPU coexistence) | gemma4:26b |
MoE (3.8B active), fast, good quality/VRAM balance |
| On-device / edge | gemma4:e4b-it-q8_0 |
12GB VRAM, vision+audio (audio via llama.cpp only) |
| Maximum quality (single-model GPU) | gemma4:31b-it-q4_K_M |
Dense 31B, sharpest but 5x slower, more VRAM pressure |
| Rapid prototyping / testing | gemma4:26b |
Fast enough for interactive dev |
| Retrieval / embeddings | embeddinggemma (308M, separate model) |
Gemma 4 has no embedding mode; use the sibling |
| CLI coding agent (openclaw / open code / pi / hermes / aider) | gemma4:26b (or compare to qwen3-coder:30b) |
Trained tool use + strong LiveCodeBench, but Google didn't publish SWE-bench — see CORPUS_cli_coding_agent.md for the honest positioning and the homelab bakeoff plan |
Anti-Patterns
- Don't use
format: "json"— infinite loops on nested schemas - Don't leave
thinkat default — eats your output budget silently - Don't leave
num_predictat default — 128 tokens is nothing - Don't leave
num_ctxat default — 2048 truncates most prompts - Don't ask for huge JSON in one call — break into sequential calls
- Don't use thinking mode for evaluation — inflates scores, wastes context
- Don't skip system prompt identity — Gemma 4 becomes a generic chatbot
- Don't use audio on 26B/31B — only E-series has audio encoder
Quick-Start Checklist
- Set
think: false - Set
num_predict>= 512 (2048+ for JSON output) - Set
num_ctx>= 4096 (scale to your prompt size) - Write explicit system prompt with identity + boundaries + output format
- Extract JSON client-side (no
format: "json") - Set
keep_alive>= 30m (or pin with -1) - For long structured output, use sequential calls
- For vision, pass base64 in
imagesarray - Test with your actual prompt length — Ollama won't warn about truncation