docs: integration tools — cross-reference graph, concept index, research digest
Codex-built tooling: cross-reference graph, concept index with build script, and research integrator that extracted 142 scholars, 175 bibliography items, 4 contradiction topics, and coverage maps for Paper 009 planning. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mortdecai
@@ -0,0 +1,471 @@
|
||||
# VIBECODE-THEORY Glossary
|
||||
|
||||
## Adaptive Communication
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: adaptive communication, constraint calibration, register matching
|
||||
- **Constraint calibration** — knowing when to specify tightly and when to leave room.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Mental Model Accuracy, Collaboration Management
|
||||
|
||||
## Agricultural Parallel
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: agricultural analogy, agricultural parallel
|
||||
The agricultural parallel: early farmers gained knowledge of seasons, irrigation, selective breeding, and storage that foragers didn't have.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: 005, 006, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 003, 006, 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Surplus, Green Revolution, Feudal Internet, Dependency Trap
|
||||
|
||||
## Automation Spiral
|
||||
Origin: 003
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: automation spiral
|
||||
The Dependency Trap is "humans can't function without AI." The Automation Spiral is "AI functions without humans." The Dependency Trap still needs people in the loop, just helpless ones.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 005, 006, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 005, 006, 007, 008, sorcerers-apprentice
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Surplus, Feedback Loop, Master-Apprentice Parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Biological Ratchet
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: biological ratchet, dependency ratchet, ratchet thesis
|
||||
They outcompete organisms that maintain redundant internal capacity "just in case." The dependency ratchet isn't a bug — it's the core mechanism by which complexity increases.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Infrastructure Threshold, Cognitive Preference Shift, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Cheating Frame
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cheating frame, did we cheat
|
||||
The question "did we cheat?" assumes there's a version of the game where we don't.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Singularity as Compilation, Existential Purpose of the Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognition as a Commodity
|
||||
Origin: 005
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cognition as a commodity, cognition-as-commodity framing
|
||||
This revision does three things: stress-tests the agricultural analogy and draws its limits, adds a concrete economic mechanism (cognition as a commodity with a collapsing price), introduces the Y2K parallel for the dependency argument, and adds the missing fourth future.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Surplus, Feudal Internet, Information/Cognition Resource Hierarchy
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognitive Atrophy
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: open question
|
||||
Aliases: capability loss, cognitive atrophy
|
||||
**The pessimistic case:** Cognitive atrophy accelerates.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: 003, 005
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Dual Cognition Problem, Cognitive Preference Shift, Biological Ratchet
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognitive Preference Shift
|
||||
Origin: 003
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cognitive preference shift, preference shift
|
||||
The paper needs to either find harder evidence or honestly downgrade the claim from "cognitive atrophy is happening" to "we observe a preference shift that *could* lead to atrophy if sustained, but we don't yet have evidence of actual capability loss."
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 005, 007
|
||||
Referenced in: 005, 007, eves-apple, faust
|
||||
Related concepts: Dual Cognition Problem, Cognitive Atrophy, Biological Ratchet
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognitive Surplus
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cognitive surplus, surplus of cognition, the cognitive surplus
|
||||
If AI creates a comparable surplus of cognition — where not everyone needs to think through routine problems anymore — the downstream effects won't be "some jobs change." They'll be civilizational.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: 004, 005, 006, 007, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 001, 003, 004, 006, 007, 008, faust
|
||||
Related concepts: Agricultural Parallel, Cognition as a Commodity, Automation Spiral
|
||||
|
||||
## Collaboration Management
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: collaboration management, recovery, task decomposition, trust calibration
|
||||
- **Task decomposition** — breaking work into pieces that are the right size for AI collaboration.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 002, 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Adaptive Communication, Technical Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuity Argument
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: continuity argument, the continuity argument
|
||||
The human who discovered fire isn't the same species as the human who built the internet.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Ship of Theseus Problem, Identity Argument, Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Chain
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dependency chain
|
||||
People went back to light switches — not because light switches are better technology, but because the *complexity of the dependency chain* became its own burden.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Referenced in: 008, eves-apple, faust, icarus, pandoras-box, prometheus, sorcerers-apprentice, the-golem, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Biological Ratchet, Knowledge Unification, Cheating Frame
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Trap
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dependency trap, future 3: the dependency trap
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Feudal Internet, Cognitive Atrophy, Y2K Parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Dual Cognition Problem
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dual cognition problem, the dual cognition problem
|
||||
Seth reported observing both effects simultaneously in himself:
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Preference Shift, Cognitive Atrophy, Cognitive Surplus
|
||||
|
||||
## Eve's Apple
|
||||
Origin: eves-apple
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: eve's apple
|
||||
Eve's Apple maps most directly to the **cognitive preference shift** described in Paper 005.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, icarus, pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Preference Shift, Dependency Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Existential Purpose of the Chain
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: existential purpose, existential purpose of the dependency chain, the existential purpose of the dependency chain
|
||||
If the dependency chain is a knowledge unification process, does it have a direction?
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Integration Layer, Cheating Frame, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Faustian Bargain
|
||||
Origin: faust
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: faust, faustian bargain
|
||||
1592); Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, *Faust* (Part 1: 1808, Part 2: 1832) **Theme:** Trading something essential for knowledge and power — the bargain that seems rational at every step
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: tower-of-babel
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, 008, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Feedback Loop, Cognitive Preference Shift
|
||||
|
||||
## Feedback Loop
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: feedback loop
|
||||
If the feedback loop closes — if AI learns to do vibe coding without vibe coders — then the skill framework is a description of a transitional state, not a permanent one.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 007, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 005, 007, 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Automation Spiral, Master-Apprentice Parallel, Niche Construction
|
||||
|
||||
## Feudal Internet
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: feudal internet
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Agricultural Parallel, Dependency Trap, Cognition as a Commodity
|
||||
|
||||
## Green Revolution
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: green revolution
|
||||
**Agricultural parallel:** The 20th-century Green Revolution, where agricultural technology was deliberately distributed to developing nations, dramatically reducing famine.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Agricultural Parallel, Feudal Internet
|
||||
|
||||
## Icarus
|
||||
Origin: icarus
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: icarus
|
||||
Daedalus, the master craftsman, builds wings of feathers and wax for himself and his son Icarus to escape imprisonment on Crete.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: tower-of-babel
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Shelf-Life Problem, Infrastructure Threshold
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity Argument
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: essentialist, identity argument, the identity argument
|
||||
There's something essentially human — consciousness, subjective experience, mortality, biological embodiment, individual identity — and if you remove enough of those properties, the thing that remains isn't "us" regardless of continuity.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Ship of Theseus Problem, Continuity Argument, Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Information/Cognition Resource Hierarchy
|
||||
Origin: 005
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: information and cognition as resources, resource hierarchy
|
||||
Seth's hierarchy: "Information is the most valuable resource in the world.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognition as a Commodity, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure Threshold
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: infrastructure threshold
|
||||
The question for AI: **has it already crossed the infrastructure threshold, or is it still in the application phase where the ebb-and-flow pattern could pull it back?** The honest answer is that AI is right now in the transition zone.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Biological Ratchet, Premature Dependencies, Y2K Parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Layer
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: integration layer
|
||||
It's the **integration layer** that makes human cognition collectively useful for the first time in history.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Knowledge Unification, Singularity as Compilation, Existential Purpose of the Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Knowledge Unification
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: knowledge unification, the dependency chain as knowledge unification, unification of human knowledge, unification thesis
|
||||
The series has described the dependency chain — fire → language → writing → printing → internet → AI — as a sequence of increasing *capability.* Each link enables more than the one before.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Singularity as Compilation, Integration Layer
|
||||
|
||||
## Master-Apprentice Parallel
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: master-apprentice parallel, master-apprentice relationship
|
||||
The closest historical parallel is the **master-apprentice relationship** — and it's worth taking seriously, not just as a passing comparison, because the places where it holds and breaks are revealing.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Feedback Loop, Automation Spiral, The Golem
|
||||
|
||||
## Mental Model Accuracy
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: mental model, mental model accuracy
|
||||
The core competency is building and maintaining an accurate *mental model* of the AI as a collaborator — its capabilities, tendencies, failure modes, and dynamic personality.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Adaptive Communication, Collaboration Management
|
||||
|
||||
## Meta-Skill Argument
|
||||
Origin: 004
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: meta-skill, meta-skill argument
|
||||
The meta-skill of managing the overall collaboration:
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 006
|
||||
Referenced in: 001, 003, 006, faust, icarus, pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Shelf-Life Problem, Vibe Coding, Social-Cognitive Framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Neurodivergence Note
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: open question
|
||||
Aliases: neurodivergence hypothesis, neurodivergence note
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Niche Construction
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: niche construction
|
||||
There's a concept from evolutionary biology that captures what's happening better than any economic or historical analogy: **niche construction.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Feedback Loop, Recursion Observation
|
||||
|
||||
## Pandora's Box
|
||||
Origin: pandoras-box
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: pandora's box
|
||||
Pandora's Box identifies a different irreversibility than Eve's Apple: **release, not knowledge.** The problem isn't that Pandora *knows* what's in the box — it's that the contents, once released, cannot be gathered back.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Automation Spiral
|
||||
|
||||
## Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: pragmatic argument, the pragmatic argument
|
||||
The question "is it really us?" is a luxury of beings who currently have the option of surviving as-is.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Ship of Theseus Problem, Continuity Argument, Identity Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Premature Dependencies
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dependency waiting for its enabling technology, premature dependencies
|
||||
And it's the most instructive example because it reveals the mechanism: **premature dependencies fail when the complexity cost exceeds the benefit before the technology becomes infrastructure.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Infrastructure Threshold, Biological Ratchet
|
||||
|
||||
## Prometheus
|
||||
Origin: prometheus
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: prometheus
|
||||
700 BCE); Aeschylus, *Prometheus Bound* (c.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, 008, pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Theological Thread, Dependency Chain, Cheating Frame
|
||||
|
||||
## Recursion Observation
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: open question
|
||||
Aliases: cosmological → biological → linguistic → computational, recursion observation
|
||||
**Is the recursion observation meaningful or just pattern-matching?** The cosmological → linguistic → computational recursion is aesthetically appealing.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Theological Thread, Niche Construction, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Shelf-Life Problem
|
||||
Origin: 003
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: shelf life problem, shelf-life problem
|
||||
thesis) and confront the shelf-life problem - Paper 002 needs to stress-test the agricultural analogy's limits, add the missing fourth future, and ground the cognitive atrophy argument in something harder than self-report - Both papers need to engage with the temporal problem: these aren't descriptions of a stable system, they're snapshots of a system in rapid transition
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 004
|
||||
Referenced in: 004
|
||||
Related concepts: Meta-Skill Argument, Infrastructure Threshold
|
||||
|
||||
## Ship of Theseus Problem
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: identity problem, ship of theseus problem, species identity problem, the identity problem
|
||||
If the dependency chain leads to a unified human-AI intelligence capable of surviving beyond Earth — is that still "us?"
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Continuity Argument, Identity Argument, Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Singularity as Compilation
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: compilation not transcendence, compilation, not transcendence, singularity as compilation
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Knowledge Unification, Integration Layer, Cheating Frame
|
||||
|
||||
## Social-Cognitive Framework
|
||||
Origin: 004
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: social-cognitive framework, social-cognitive processes, vibe coding as social skill
|
||||
**What we propose:** Vibe coding involves significant social-cognitive processes — the same mental machinery used for modeling other minds — applied to AI collaboration.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 002, 003, 005, 006
|
||||
Referenced in: 001, 002, 003, 005, 006
|
||||
Related concepts: Vibe Coding, Mental Model Accuracy, Adaptive Communication, Collaboration Management
|
||||
|
||||
## Sorcerer's Apprentice
|
||||
Origin: sorcerers-apprentice
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: sorcerer's apprentice
|
||||
The Sorcerer's Apprentice identifies the most specific and practical failure mode: **the gap between the ability to start an automated process and the ability to control it.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Automation Spiral, Feedback Loop, Dependency Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Foundation
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: technical expertise, technical foundation
|
||||
Technical foundation helps enormously, but it's not the differentiator.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003, 004
|
||||
Referenced in: 003, 006
|
||||
Related concepts: Vibe Coding, Collaboration Management, Meta-Skill Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## The Golem
|
||||
Origin: the-golem
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: golem, the golem
|
||||
**Source:** Jewish folklore, most prominently the Golem of Prague (Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, 16th century); earlier references in the Talmud and Sefer Yetzirah **Theme:** Creating a servant from raw materials that serves faithfully until it doesn't — and has no interiority to appeal to
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Master-Apprentice Parallel, Dependency Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Theological Thread
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: theological thread
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, 008, prometheus
|
||||
Related concepts: Prometheus, Knowledge Unification, Recursion Observation
|
||||
|
||||
## Tower of Babel
|
||||
Origin: tower-of-babel
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: babel, tower of babel
|
||||
Babel identifies a failure mode the other allegories miss: **the fragmentation of shared understanding as a consequence of — or response to — collective overreach.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Vibe Coding
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: vibe coding
|
||||
The trigger for this paper: one of the authors (Seth) has been vibe coding since January 2026, building a homelab infrastructure with Claude Code across dozens of projects.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 002, 003, 004, 006, 007
|
||||
Referenced in: 002, 003, 005, 006, 007, 008, faust, icarus, prometheus, sorcerers-apprentice, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Mental Model Accuracy, Meta-Skill Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Y2K Parallel
|
||||
Origin: 005
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: ai y2k moment, y2k moment, y2k parallel
|
||||
This revision does three things: stress-tests the agricultural analogy and draws its limits, adds a concrete economic mechanism (cognition as a commodity with a collapsing price), introduces the Y2K parallel for the dependency argument, and adds the missing fourth future.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Trap, Infrastructure Threshold, Cognitive Surplus
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user