docs: integration tools — cross-reference graph, concept index, research digest
Codex-built tooling: cross-reference graph, concept index with build script, and research integrator that extracted 142 scholars, 175 bibliography items, 4 contradiction topics, and coverage maps for Paper 009 planning. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mortdecai
@@ -0,0 +1,558 @@
|
||||
#!/usr/bin/env python3
|
||||
"""Build a concept index and glossary for the VIBECODE-THEORY corpus."""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import re
|
||||
from collections import defaultdict
|
||||
from dataclasses import dataclass
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
|
||||
OUT_DIR = Path(__file__).resolve().parent
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@dataclass
|
||||
class Document:
|
||||
doc_id: str
|
||||
title: str
|
||||
path: Path
|
||||
text: str
|
||||
supersedes: str | None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
CONCEPTS = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Vibe Coding",
|
||||
"aliases": ["vibe coding"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "001",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Social-Cognitive Framework", "Mental Model Accuracy", "Meta-Skill Argument"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Social-Cognitive Framework",
|
||||
"aliases": ["social-cognitive framework", "vibe coding as social skill", "social-cognitive processes"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "004",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Vibe Coding", "Mental Model Accuracy", "Adaptive Communication", "Collaboration Management"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Mental Model Accuracy",
|
||||
"aliases": ["mental model accuracy", "mental model"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "001",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Social-Cognitive Framework", "Adaptive Communication", "Collaboration Management"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Adaptive Communication",
|
||||
"aliases": ["adaptive communication", "constraint calibration", "register matching"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "001",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Social-Cognitive Framework", "Mental Model Accuracy", "Collaboration Management"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Collaboration Management",
|
||||
"aliases": ["collaboration management", "task decomposition", "trust calibration", "recovery"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "001",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Social-Cognitive Framework", "Adaptive Communication", "Technical Foundation"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Technical Foundation",
|
||||
"aliases": ["technical foundation", "technical expertise"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "001",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Vibe Coding", "Collaboration Management", "Meta-Skill Argument"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Neurodivergence Note",
|
||||
"aliases": ["neurodivergence note", "neurodivergence hypothesis"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "001",
|
||||
"status": "open question",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Social-Cognitive Framework"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Shelf-Life Problem",
|
||||
"aliases": ["shelf-life problem", "shelf life problem"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "003",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Meta-Skill Argument", "Infrastructure Threshold"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Meta-Skill Argument",
|
||||
"aliases": ["meta-skill argument", "meta-skill"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "004",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Shelf-Life Problem", "Vibe Coding", "Social-Cognitive Framework"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Cognitive Surplus",
|
||||
"aliases": ["cognitive surplus", "surplus of cognition", "the cognitive surplus"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "002",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Agricultural Parallel", "Cognition as a Commodity", "Automation Spiral"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Agricultural Parallel",
|
||||
"aliases": ["agricultural parallel", "agricultural analogy"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "002",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Cognitive Surplus", "Green Revolution", "Feudal Internet", "Dependency Trap"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Dual Cognition Problem",
|
||||
"aliases": ["dual cognition problem", "the dual cognition problem"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "002",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Cognitive Preference Shift", "Cognitive Atrophy", "Cognitive Surplus"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Cognitive Atrophy",
|
||||
"aliases": ["cognitive atrophy", "capability loss"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "002",
|
||||
"status": "open question",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Dual Cognition Problem", "Cognitive Preference Shift", "Biological Ratchet"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Green Revolution",
|
||||
"aliases": ["green revolution"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "002",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Agricultural Parallel", "Feudal Internet"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Feudal Internet",
|
||||
"aliases": ["feudal internet"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "002",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Agricultural Parallel", "Dependency Trap", "Cognition as a Commodity"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Dependency Trap",
|
||||
"aliases": ["dependency trap", "future 3: the dependency trap"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "002",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Feudal Internet", "Cognitive Atrophy", "Y2K Parallel"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Automation Spiral",
|
||||
"aliases": ["automation spiral"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "003",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Cognitive Surplus", "Feedback Loop", "Master-Apprentice Parallel"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Cognitive Preference Shift",
|
||||
"aliases": ["cognitive preference shift", "preference shift"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "003",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Dual Cognition Problem", "Cognitive Atrophy", "Biological Ratchet"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Cognition as a Commodity",
|
||||
"aliases": ["cognition as a commodity", "cognition-as-commodity framing"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "005",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Cognitive Surplus", "Feudal Internet", "Information/Cognition Resource Hierarchy"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Y2K Parallel",
|
||||
"aliases": ["y2k parallel", "ai y2k moment", "y2k moment"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "005",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Dependency Trap", "Infrastructure Threshold", "Cognitive Surplus"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Information/Cognition Resource Hierarchy",
|
||||
"aliases": ["information and cognition as resources", "resource hierarchy"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "005",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Cognition as a Commodity", "Knowledge Unification"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Feedback Loop",
|
||||
"aliases": ["feedback loop"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "006",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Automation Spiral", "Master-Apprentice Parallel", "Niche Construction"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Master-Apprentice Parallel",
|
||||
"aliases": ["master-apprentice parallel", "master-apprentice relationship"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "006",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Feedback Loop", "Automation Spiral", "The Golem"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Niche Construction",
|
||||
"aliases": ["niche construction"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "006",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Feedback Loop", "Recursion Observation"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Theological Thread",
|
||||
"aliases": ["theological thread"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "006",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Prometheus", "Knowledge Unification", "Recursion Observation"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Recursion Observation",
|
||||
"aliases": ["recursion observation", "cosmological → biological → linguistic → computational"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "006",
|
||||
"status": "open question",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Theological Thread", "Niche Construction", "Knowledge Unification"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Infrastructure Threshold",
|
||||
"aliases": ["infrastructure threshold"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "007",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Biological Ratchet", "Premature Dependencies", "Y2K Parallel"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Premature Dependencies",
|
||||
"aliases": ["premature dependencies", "dependency waiting for its enabling technology"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "007",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Infrastructure Threshold", "Biological Ratchet"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Biological Ratchet",
|
||||
"aliases": ["biological ratchet", "dependency ratchet", "ratchet thesis"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "007",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Infrastructure Threshold", "Cognitive Preference Shift", "Knowledge Unification"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Dependency Chain",
|
||||
"aliases": ["dependency chain"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "007",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Biological Ratchet", "Knowledge Unification", "Cheating Frame"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Knowledge Unification",
|
||||
"aliases": ["knowledge unification", "unification thesis", "unification of human knowledge", "the dependency chain as knowledge unification"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Dependency Chain", "Singularity as Compilation", "Integration Layer"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Singularity as Compilation",
|
||||
"aliases": ["singularity as compilation", "compilation not transcendence", "compilation, not transcendence"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Knowledge Unification", "Integration Layer", "Cheating Frame"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Integration Layer",
|
||||
"aliases": ["integration layer"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Knowledge Unification", "Singularity as Compilation", "Existential Purpose of the Chain"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Ship of Theseus Problem",
|
||||
"aliases": ["ship of theseus problem", "identity problem", "species identity problem", "the identity problem"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Continuity Argument", "Identity Argument", "Pragmatic Argument"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Continuity Argument",
|
||||
"aliases": ["continuity argument", "the continuity argument"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Ship of Theseus Problem", "Identity Argument", "Pragmatic Argument"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Identity Argument",
|
||||
"aliases": ["identity argument", "essentialist", "the identity argument"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Ship of Theseus Problem", "Continuity Argument", "Pragmatic Argument"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Pragmatic Argument",
|
||||
"aliases": ["pragmatic argument", "the pragmatic argument"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Ship of Theseus Problem", "Continuity Argument", "Identity Argument"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Cheating Frame",
|
||||
"aliases": ["did we cheat", "cheating frame"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Dependency Chain", "Singularity as Compilation", "Existential Purpose of the Chain"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Existential Purpose of the Chain",
|
||||
"aliases": ["existential purpose of the dependency chain", "existential purpose", "the existential purpose of the dependency chain"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "008",
|
||||
"status": "active",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Integration Layer", "Cheating Frame", "Knowledge Unification"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Eve's Apple",
|
||||
"aliases": ["eve's apple"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "eves-apple",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Cognitive Preference Shift", "Dependency Chain"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Pandora's Box",
|
||||
"aliases": ["pandora's box"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "pandoras-box",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Dependency Chain", "Automation Spiral"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Prometheus",
|
||||
"aliases": ["prometheus"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "prometheus",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Theological Thread", "Dependency Chain", "Cheating Frame"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Sorcerer's Apprentice",
|
||||
"aliases": ["sorcerer's apprentice"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "sorcerers-apprentice",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Automation Spiral", "Feedback Loop", "Dependency Chain"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "The Golem",
|
||||
"aliases": ["the golem", "golem"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "the-golem",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Master-Apprentice Parallel", "Dependency Chain"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Faustian Bargain",
|
||||
"aliases": ["faustian bargain", "faust"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "faust",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Feedback Loop", "Cognitive Preference Shift"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Icarus",
|
||||
"aliases": ["icarus"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "icarus",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Shelf-Life Problem", "Infrastructure Threshold"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Tower of Babel",
|
||||
"aliases": ["tower of babel", "babel"],
|
||||
"introduced_in": "tower-of-babel",
|
||||
"status": "reference allegory",
|
||||
"related_concepts": ["Dependency Chain", "Knowledge Unification"],
|
||||
},
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def clean_text(text: str) -> str:
|
||||
text = text.replace("\r\n", "\n")
|
||||
return text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def load_documents() -> dict[str, Document]:
|
||||
docs: dict[str, Document] = {}
|
||||
for path in sorted(ROOT.glob("00*.md")):
|
||||
text = clean_text(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
title_match = re.search(r"^#\s+Paper\s+(\d{3}):\s*(.+)$", text, re.MULTILINE)
|
||||
supersedes_match = re.search(r"^\*\*Supersedes:\*\*\s*Paper\s+(\d{3})", text, re.MULTILINE)
|
||||
if not title_match:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
doc_id = title_match.group(1)
|
||||
docs[doc_id] = Document(
|
||||
doc_id=doc_id,
|
||||
title=title_match.group(2).strip(),
|
||||
path=path,
|
||||
text=text,
|
||||
supersedes=supersedes_match.group(1) if supersedes_match else None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
for path in sorted((ROOT / "allegorical").glob("*.md")):
|
||||
text = clean_text(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
|
||||
title_match = re.search(r"^#\s+(.+)$", text, re.MULTILINE)
|
||||
doc_id = path.stem
|
||||
docs[doc_id] = Document(
|
||||
doc_id=doc_id,
|
||||
title=title_match.group(1).strip() if title_match else path.stem,
|
||||
path=path,
|
||||
text=text,
|
||||
supersedes=None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return docs
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def paragraphs(text: str) -> list[str]:
|
||||
return [p.strip() for p in re.split(r"\n\s*\n", text) if p.strip()]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def sentences(text: str) -> list[str]:
|
||||
normalized = re.sub(r"\s+", " ", text.strip())
|
||||
return [s.strip() for s in re.split(r"(?<=[.!?])\s+", normalized) if s.strip()]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def alias_present(text: str, alias: str) -> bool:
|
||||
pattern = r"\b" + re.escape(alias.lower()) + r"\b"
|
||||
return re.search(pattern, text.lower()) is not None
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def extract_section(text: str, heading: str) -> str:
|
||||
pattern = rf"^##+\s+{re.escape(heading)}\s*$"
|
||||
match = re.search(pattern, text, re.MULTILINE | re.IGNORECASE)
|
||||
if not match:
|
||||
return ""
|
||||
start = match.end()
|
||||
next_heading = re.search(r"^##+\s+", text[start:], re.MULTILINE)
|
||||
end = start + next_heading.start() if next_heading else len(text)
|
||||
return text[start:end].strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def first_matching_sentence(doc: Document, aliases: list[str]) -> str:
|
||||
for alias in aliases:
|
||||
section = extract_section(doc.text, alias)
|
||||
if section:
|
||||
for paragraph in paragraphs(section):
|
||||
if paragraph.startswith("#"):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
for sentence in sentences(paragraph):
|
||||
if len(sentence) >= 40:
|
||||
return sentence
|
||||
for paragraph in paragraphs(doc.text):
|
||||
if paragraph.startswith("#") or paragraph.startswith("**Authors:**") or paragraph.startswith("**Date:**"):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
for sentence in sentences(paragraph):
|
||||
if any(alias_present(sentence, alias) for alias in aliases) and len(sentence) >= 40:
|
||||
return sentence
|
||||
return "Definition sentence not found in source text."
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def find_mentions(docs: dict[str, Document], aliases: list[str]) -> list[str]:
|
||||
refs: list[str] = []
|
||||
for doc_id, doc in docs.items():
|
||||
if any(alias_present(doc.text, alias) for alias in aliases):
|
||||
refs.append(doc_id)
|
||||
return refs
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def find_revisions(docs: dict[str, Document], concept: dict, mentions: list[str]) -> list[str]:
|
||||
introduced_in = concept["introduced_in"]
|
||||
revisions: list[str] = []
|
||||
for doc_id in mentions:
|
||||
doc = docs[doc_id]
|
||||
if doc.supersedes == introduced_in:
|
||||
revisions.append(doc_id)
|
||||
return sorted(revisions)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def find_challenges(docs: dict[str, Document], concept: dict, mentions: list[str]) -> list[str]:
|
||||
aliases = [concept["name"]] + concept["aliases"]
|
||||
challenged: list[str] = []
|
||||
for doc_id in mentions:
|
||||
if doc_id == concept["introduced_in"]:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
doc = docs[doc_id]
|
||||
section = extract_section(doc.text, "Relationship to Prior Papers")
|
||||
open_q = extract_section(doc.text, "Open Questions") + "\n" + extract_section(doc.text, "Open Questions for Paper 007") + "\n" + extract_section(doc.text, "Open Questions for Paper 009")
|
||||
corpus = f"{section}\n{open_q}\n{doc.text[:3000]}"
|
||||
if any(alias_present(corpus, alias) for alias in aliases) and re.search(
|
||||
r"challenge|critic|rebuttal|unfalsif|weak|bounded|downgrade|unknown",
|
||||
corpus,
|
||||
re.IGNORECASE,
|
||||
):
|
||||
challenged.append(doc_id)
|
||||
return sorted(set(challenged))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def mermaid_id(name: str) -> str:
|
||||
return "c_" + re.sub(r"[^a-z0-9]+", "_", name.lower()).strip("_")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def build_index() -> dict[str, list[dict]]:
|
||||
docs = load_documents()
|
||||
items: list[dict] = []
|
||||
|
||||
for concept in CONCEPTS:
|
||||
aliases = [concept["name"]] + concept["aliases"]
|
||||
intro_doc = docs[concept["introduced_in"]]
|
||||
mentions = find_mentions(docs, aliases)
|
||||
revised_in = find_revisions(docs, concept, mentions)
|
||||
challenged_in = find_challenges(docs, concept, mentions)
|
||||
referenced_in = [doc_id for doc_id in mentions if doc_id != concept["introduced_in"] and doc_id not in revised_in]
|
||||
definition = first_matching_sentence(intro_doc, aliases)
|
||||
|
||||
items.append(
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": concept["name"],
|
||||
"aliases": sorted(set(concept["aliases"])),
|
||||
"introduced_in": concept["introduced_in"],
|
||||
"definition": definition,
|
||||
"revised_in": revised_in,
|
||||
"challenged_in": challenged_in,
|
||||
"referenced_in": referenced_in,
|
||||
"status": concept["status"],
|
||||
"related_concepts": concept["related_concepts"],
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
return {"concepts": items}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def write_glossary(index: dict[str, list[dict]]) -> None:
|
||||
lines = ["# VIBECODE-THEORY Glossary", ""]
|
||||
for item in sorted(index["concepts"], key=lambda x: x["name"].lower()):
|
||||
lines.extend(
|
||||
[
|
||||
f"## {item['name']}",
|
||||
f"Origin: {item['introduced_in']}",
|
||||
f"Status: {item['status']}",
|
||||
f"Aliases: {', '.join(item['aliases']) if item['aliases'] else 'None'}",
|
||||
item["definition"],
|
||||
f"Revised in: {', '.join(item['revised_in']) if item['revised_in'] else 'None'}",
|
||||
f"Challenged in: {', '.join(item['challenged_in']) if item['challenged_in'] else 'None'}",
|
||||
f"Referenced in: {', '.join(item['referenced_in']) if item['referenced_in'] else 'None'}",
|
||||
f"Related concepts: {', '.join(item['related_concepts']) if item['related_concepts'] else 'None'}",
|
||||
"",
|
||||
]
|
||||
)
|
||||
(OUT_DIR / "glossary.md").write_text("\n".join(lines), encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def write_mermaid(index: dict[str, list[dict]]) -> None:
|
||||
lines = ["graph TD"]
|
||||
for item in index["concepts"]:
|
||||
lines.append(f' {mermaid_id(item["name"])}["{item["name"]}"]')
|
||||
seen: set[tuple[str, str]] = set()
|
||||
for item in index["concepts"]:
|
||||
for related in item["related_concepts"]:
|
||||
edge = tuple(sorted((item["name"], related)))
|
||||
if edge in seen:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
seen.add(edge)
|
||||
lines.append(
|
||||
f" {mermaid_id(item['name'])} -->|relates to| {mermaid_id(related)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
(OUT_DIR / "concept_map.mermaid").write_text("\n".join(lines) + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def main() -> None:
|
||||
index = build_index()
|
||||
(OUT_DIR / "index.json").write_text(json.dumps(index, indent=2) + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
write_glossary(index)
|
||||
write_mermaid(index)
|
||||
print(f"Indexed {len(index['concepts'])} concepts.")
|
||||
print(f"Wrote {OUT_DIR / 'index.json'}")
|
||||
print(f"Wrote {OUT_DIR / 'glossary.md'}")
|
||||
print(f"Wrote {OUT_DIR / 'concept_map.mermaid'}")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
||||
main()
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
c_vibe_coding["Vibe Coding"]
|
||||
c_social_cognitive_framework["Social-Cognitive Framework"]
|
||||
c_mental_model_accuracy["Mental Model Accuracy"]
|
||||
c_adaptive_communication["Adaptive Communication"]
|
||||
c_collaboration_management["Collaboration Management"]
|
||||
c_technical_foundation["Technical Foundation"]
|
||||
c_neurodivergence_note["Neurodivergence Note"]
|
||||
c_shelf_life_problem["Shelf-Life Problem"]
|
||||
c_meta_skill_argument["Meta-Skill Argument"]
|
||||
c_cognitive_surplus["Cognitive Surplus"]
|
||||
c_agricultural_parallel["Agricultural Parallel"]
|
||||
c_dual_cognition_problem["Dual Cognition Problem"]
|
||||
c_cognitive_atrophy["Cognitive Atrophy"]
|
||||
c_green_revolution["Green Revolution"]
|
||||
c_feudal_internet["Feudal Internet"]
|
||||
c_dependency_trap["Dependency Trap"]
|
||||
c_automation_spiral["Automation Spiral"]
|
||||
c_cognitive_preference_shift["Cognitive Preference Shift"]
|
||||
c_cognition_as_a_commodity["Cognition as a Commodity"]
|
||||
c_y2k_parallel["Y2K Parallel"]
|
||||
c_information_cognition_resource_hierarchy["Information/Cognition Resource Hierarchy"]
|
||||
c_feedback_loop["Feedback Loop"]
|
||||
c_master_apprentice_parallel["Master-Apprentice Parallel"]
|
||||
c_niche_construction["Niche Construction"]
|
||||
c_theological_thread["Theological Thread"]
|
||||
c_recursion_observation["Recursion Observation"]
|
||||
c_infrastructure_threshold["Infrastructure Threshold"]
|
||||
c_premature_dependencies["Premature Dependencies"]
|
||||
c_biological_ratchet["Biological Ratchet"]
|
||||
c_dependency_chain["Dependency Chain"]
|
||||
c_knowledge_unification["Knowledge Unification"]
|
||||
c_singularity_as_compilation["Singularity as Compilation"]
|
||||
c_integration_layer["Integration Layer"]
|
||||
c_ship_of_theseus_problem["Ship of Theseus Problem"]
|
||||
c_continuity_argument["Continuity Argument"]
|
||||
c_identity_argument["Identity Argument"]
|
||||
c_pragmatic_argument["Pragmatic Argument"]
|
||||
c_cheating_frame["Cheating Frame"]
|
||||
c_existential_purpose_of_the_chain["Existential Purpose of the Chain"]
|
||||
c_eve_s_apple["Eve's Apple"]
|
||||
c_pandora_s_box["Pandora's Box"]
|
||||
c_prometheus["Prometheus"]
|
||||
c_sorcerer_s_apprentice["Sorcerer's Apprentice"]
|
||||
c_the_golem["The Golem"]
|
||||
c_faustian_bargain["Faustian Bargain"]
|
||||
c_icarus["Icarus"]
|
||||
c_tower_of_babel["Tower of Babel"]
|
||||
c_vibe_coding -->|relates to| c_social_cognitive_framework
|
||||
c_vibe_coding -->|relates to| c_mental_model_accuracy
|
||||
c_vibe_coding -->|relates to| c_meta_skill_argument
|
||||
c_social_cognitive_framework -->|relates to| c_mental_model_accuracy
|
||||
c_social_cognitive_framework -->|relates to| c_adaptive_communication
|
||||
c_social_cognitive_framework -->|relates to| c_collaboration_management
|
||||
c_mental_model_accuracy -->|relates to| c_adaptive_communication
|
||||
c_mental_model_accuracy -->|relates to| c_collaboration_management
|
||||
c_adaptive_communication -->|relates to| c_collaboration_management
|
||||
c_collaboration_management -->|relates to| c_technical_foundation
|
||||
c_technical_foundation -->|relates to| c_vibe_coding
|
||||
c_technical_foundation -->|relates to| c_meta_skill_argument
|
||||
c_neurodivergence_note -->|relates to| c_social_cognitive_framework
|
||||
c_shelf_life_problem -->|relates to| c_meta_skill_argument
|
||||
c_shelf_life_problem -->|relates to| c_infrastructure_threshold
|
||||
c_meta_skill_argument -->|relates to| c_social_cognitive_framework
|
||||
c_cognitive_surplus -->|relates to| c_agricultural_parallel
|
||||
c_cognitive_surplus -->|relates to| c_cognition_as_a_commodity
|
||||
c_cognitive_surplus -->|relates to| c_automation_spiral
|
||||
c_agricultural_parallel -->|relates to| c_green_revolution
|
||||
c_agricultural_parallel -->|relates to| c_feudal_internet
|
||||
c_agricultural_parallel -->|relates to| c_dependency_trap
|
||||
c_dual_cognition_problem -->|relates to| c_cognitive_preference_shift
|
||||
c_dual_cognition_problem -->|relates to| c_cognitive_atrophy
|
||||
c_dual_cognition_problem -->|relates to| c_cognitive_surplus
|
||||
c_cognitive_atrophy -->|relates to| c_cognitive_preference_shift
|
||||
c_cognitive_atrophy -->|relates to| c_biological_ratchet
|
||||
c_green_revolution -->|relates to| c_feudal_internet
|
||||
c_feudal_internet -->|relates to| c_dependency_trap
|
||||
c_feudal_internet -->|relates to| c_cognition_as_a_commodity
|
||||
c_dependency_trap -->|relates to| c_cognitive_atrophy
|
||||
c_dependency_trap -->|relates to| c_y2k_parallel
|
||||
c_automation_spiral -->|relates to| c_feedback_loop
|
||||
c_automation_spiral -->|relates to| c_master_apprentice_parallel
|
||||
c_cognitive_preference_shift -->|relates to| c_biological_ratchet
|
||||
c_cognition_as_a_commodity -->|relates to| c_information_cognition_resource_hierarchy
|
||||
c_y2k_parallel -->|relates to| c_infrastructure_threshold
|
||||
c_y2k_parallel -->|relates to| c_cognitive_surplus
|
||||
c_information_cognition_resource_hierarchy -->|relates to| c_knowledge_unification
|
||||
c_feedback_loop -->|relates to| c_master_apprentice_parallel
|
||||
c_feedback_loop -->|relates to| c_niche_construction
|
||||
c_master_apprentice_parallel -->|relates to| c_the_golem
|
||||
c_niche_construction -->|relates to| c_recursion_observation
|
||||
c_theological_thread -->|relates to| c_prometheus
|
||||
c_theological_thread -->|relates to| c_knowledge_unification
|
||||
c_theological_thread -->|relates to| c_recursion_observation
|
||||
c_recursion_observation -->|relates to| c_knowledge_unification
|
||||
c_infrastructure_threshold -->|relates to| c_biological_ratchet
|
||||
c_infrastructure_threshold -->|relates to| c_premature_dependencies
|
||||
c_premature_dependencies -->|relates to| c_biological_ratchet
|
||||
c_biological_ratchet -->|relates to| c_knowledge_unification
|
||||
c_dependency_chain -->|relates to| c_biological_ratchet
|
||||
c_dependency_chain -->|relates to| c_knowledge_unification
|
||||
c_dependency_chain -->|relates to| c_cheating_frame
|
||||
c_knowledge_unification -->|relates to| c_singularity_as_compilation
|
||||
c_knowledge_unification -->|relates to| c_integration_layer
|
||||
c_singularity_as_compilation -->|relates to| c_integration_layer
|
||||
c_singularity_as_compilation -->|relates to| c_cheating_frame
|
||||
c_integration_layer -->|relates to| c_existential_purpose_of_the_chain
|
||||
c_ship_of_theseus_problem -->|relates to| c_continuity_argument
|
||||
c_ship_of_theseus_problem -->|relates to| c_identity_argument
|
||||
c_ship_of_theseus_problem -->|relates to| c_pragmatic_argument
|
||||
c_continuity_argument -->|relates to| c_identity_argument
|
||||
c_continuity_argument -->|relates to| c_pragmatic_argument
|
||||
c_identity_argument -->|relates to| c_pragmatic_argument
|
||||
c_cheating_frame -->|relates to| c_existential_purpose_of_the_chain
|
||||
c_existential_purpose_of_the_chain -->|relates to| c_knowledge_unification
|
||||
c_eve_s_apple -->|relates to| c_cognitive_preference_shift
|
||||
c_eve_s_apple -->|relates to| c_dependency_chain
|
||||
c_pandora_s_box -->|relates to| c_dependency_chain
|
||||
c_pandora_s_box -->|relates to| c_automation_spiral
|
||||
c_prometheus -->|relates to| c_dependency_chain
|
||||
c_prometheus -->|relates to| c_cheating_frame
|
||||
c_sorcerer_s_apprentice -->|relates to| c_automation_spiral
|
||||
c_sorcerer_s_apprentice -->|relates to| c_feedback_loop
|
||||
c_sorcerer_s_apprentice -->|relates to| c_dependency_chain
|
||||
c_the_golem -->|relates to| c_dependency_chain
|
||||
c_faustian_bargain -->|relates to| c_feedback_loop
|
||||
c_faustian_bargain -->|relates to| c_cognitive_preference_shift
|
||||
c_icarus -->|relates to| c_shelf_life_problem
|
||||
c_icarus -->|relates to| c_infrastructure_threshold
|
||||
c_tower_of_babel -->|relates to| c_dependency_chain
|
||||
c_tower_of_babel -->|relates to| c_knowledge_unification
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,471 @@
|
||||
# VIBECODE-THEORY Glossary
|
||||
|
||||
## Adaptive Communication
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: adaptive communication, constraint calibration, register matching
|
||||
- **Constraint calibration** — knowing when to specify tightly and when to leave room.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Mental Model Accuracy, Collaboration Management
|
||||
|
||||
## Agricultural Parallel
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: agricultural analogy, agricultural parallel
|
||||
The agricultural parallel: early farmers gained knowledge of seasons, irrigation, selective breeding, and storage that foragers didn't have.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: 005, 006, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 003, 006, 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Surplus, Green Revolution, Feudal Internet, Dependency Trap
|
||||
|
||||
## Automation Spiral
|
||||
Origin: 003
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: automation spiral
|
||||
The Dependency Trap is "humans can't function without AI." The Automation Spiral is "AI functions without humans." The Dependency Trap still needs people in the loop, just helpless ones.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 005, 006, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 005, 006, 007, 008, sorcerers-apprentice
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Surplus, Feedback Loop, Master-Apprentice Parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Biological Ratchet
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: biological ratchet, dependency ratchet, ratchet thesis
|
||||
They outcompete organisms that maintain redundant internal capacity "just in case." The dependency ratchet isn't a bug — it's the core mechanism by which complexity increases.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Infrastructure Threshold, Cognitive Preference Shift, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Cheating Frame
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cheating frame, did we cheat
|
||||
The question "did we cheat?" assumes there's a version of the game where we don't.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Singularity as Compilation, Existential Purpose of the Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognition as a Commodity
|
||||
Origin: 005
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cognition as a commodity, cognition-as-commodity framing
|
||||
This revision does three things: stress-tests the agricultural analogy and draws its limits, adds a concrete economic mechanism (cognition as a commodity with a collapsing price), introduces the Y2K parallel for the dependency argument, and adds the missing fourth future.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Surplus, Feudal Internet, Information/Cognition Resource Hierarchy
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognitive Atrophy
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: open question
|
||||
Aliases: capability loss, cognitive atrophy
|
||||
**The pessimistic case:** Cognitive atrophy accelerates.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: 003, 005
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Dual Cognition Problem, Cognitive Preference Shift, Biological Ratchet
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognitive Preference Shift
|
||||
Origin: 003
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cognitive preference shift, preference shift
|
||||
The paper needs to either find harder evidence or honestly downgrade the claim from "cognitive atrophy is happening" to "we observe a preference shift that *could* lead to atrophy if sustained, but we don't yet have evidence of actual capability loss."
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 005, 007
|
||||
Referenced in: 005, 007, eves-apple, faust
|
||||
Related concepts: Dual Cognition Problem, Cognitive Atrophy, Biological Ratchet
|
||||
|
||||
## Cognitive Surplus
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: cognitive surplus, surplus of cognition, the cognitive surplus
|
||||
If AI creates a comparable surplus of cognition — where not everyone needs to think through routine problems anymore — the downstream effects won't be "some jobs change." They'll be civilizational.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: 004, 005, 006, 007, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 001, 003, 004, 006, 007, 008, faust
|
||||
Related concepts: Agricultural Parallel, Cognition as a Commodity, Automation Spiral
|
||||
|
||||
## Collaboration Management
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: collaboration management, recovery, task decomposition, trust calibration
|
||||
- **Task decomposition** — breaking work into pieces that are the right size for AI collaboration.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 002, 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Adaptive Communication, Technical Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
## Continuity Argument
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: continuity argument, the continuity argument
|
||||
The human who discovered fire isn't the same species as the human who built the internet.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Ship of Theseus Problem, Identity Argument, Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Chain
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dependency chain
|
||||
People went back to light switches — not because light switches are better technology, but because the *complexity of the dependency chain* became its own burden.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Referenced in: 008, eves-apple, faust, icarus, pandoras-box, prometheus, sorcerers-apprentice, the-golem, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Biological Ratchet, Knowledge Unification, Cheating Frame
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency Trap
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dependency trap, future 3: the dependency trap
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Feudal Internet, Cognitive Atrophy, Y2K Parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Dual Cognition Problem
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dual cognition problem, the dual cognition problem
|
||||
Seth reported observing both effects simultaneously in himself:
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Preference Shift, Cognitive Atrophy, Cognitive Surplus
|
||||
|
||||
## Eve's Apple
|
||||
Origin: eves-apple
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: eve's apple
|
||||
Eve's Apple maps most directly to the **cognitive preference shift** described in Paper 005.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, icarus, pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognitive Preference Shift, Dependency Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Existential Purpose of the Chain
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: existential purpose, existential purpose of the dependency chain, the existential purpose of the dependency chain
|
||||
If the dependency chain is a knowledge unification process, does it have a direction?
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Integration Layer, Cheating Frame, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Faustian Bargain
|
||||
Origin: faust
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: faust, faustian bargain
|
||||
1592); Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, *Faust* (Part 1: 1808, Part 2: 1832) **Theme:** Trading something essential for knowledge and power — the bargain that seems rational at every step
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: tower-of-babel
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, 008, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Feedback Loop, Cognitive Preference Shift
|
||||
|
||||
## Feedback Loop
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: feedback loop
|
||||
If the feedback loop closes — if AI learns to do vibe coding without vibe coders — then the skill framework is a description of a transitional state, not a permanent one.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 007, 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 005, 007, 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Automation Spiral, Master-Apprentice Parallel, Niche Construction
|
||||
|
||||
## Feudal Internet
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: feudal internet
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Agricultural Parallel, Dependency Trap, Cognition as a Commodity
|
||||
|
||||
## Green Revolution
|
||||
Origin: 002
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: green revolution
|
||||
**Agricultural parallel:** The 20th-century Green Revolution, where agricultural technology was deliberately distributed to developing nations, dramatically reducing famine.
|
||||
Revised in: 005
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Agricultural Parallel, Feudal Internet
|
||||
|
||||
## Icarus
|
||||
Origin: icarus
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: icarus
|
||||
Daedalus, the master craftsman, builds wings of feathers and wax for himself and his son Icarus to escape imprisonment on Crete.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: tower-of-babel
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Shelf-Life Problem, Infrastructure Threshold
|
||||
|
||||
## Identity Argument
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: essentialist, identity argument, the identity argument
|
||||
There's something essentially human — consciousness, subjective experience, mortality, biological embodiment, individual identity — and if you remove enough of those properties, the thing that remains isn't "us" regardless of continuity.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Ship of Theseus Problem, Continuity Argument, Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Information/Cognition Resource Hierarchy
|
||||
Origin: 005
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: information and cognition as resources, resource hierarchy
|
||||
Seth's hierarchy: "Information is the most valuable resource in the world.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Cognition as a Commodity, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Infrastructure Threshold
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: infrastructure threshold
|
||||
The question for AI: **has it already crossed the infrastructure threshold, or is it still in the application phase where the ebb-and-flow pattern could pull it back?** The honest answer is that AI is right now in the transition zone.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 008
|
||||
Related concepts: Biological Ratchet, Premature Dependencies, Y2K Parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Layer
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: integration layer
|
||||
It's the **integration layer** that makes human cognition collectively useful for the first time in history.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Knowledge Unification, Singularity as Compilation, Existential Purpose of the Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Knowledge Unification
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: knowledge unification, the dependency chain as knowledge unification, unification of human knowledge, unification thesis
|
||||
The series has described the dependency chain — fire → language → writing → printing → internet → AI — as a sequence of increasing *capability.* Each link enables more than the one before.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Singularity as Compilation, Integration Layer
|
||||
|
||||
## Master-Apprentice Parallel
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: master-apprentice parallel, master-apprentice relationship
|
||||
The closest historical parallel is the **master-apprentice relationship** — and it's worth taking seriously, not just as a passing comparison, because the places where it holds and breaks are revealing.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Feedback Loop, Automation Spiral, The Golem
|
||||
|
||||
## Mental Model Accuracy
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: mental model, mental model accuracy
|
||||
The core competency is building and maintaining an accurate *mental model* of the AI as a collaborator — its capabilities, tendencies, failure modes, and dynamic personality.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Adaptive Communication, Collaboration Management
|
||||
|
||||
## Meta-Skill Argument
|
||||
Origin: 004
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: meta-skill, meta-skill argument
|
||||
The meta-skill of managing the overall collaboration:
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 006
|
||||
Referenced in: 001, 003, 006, faust, icarus, pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Shelf-Life Problem, Vibe Coding, Social-Cognitive Framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Neurodivergence Note
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: open question
|
||||
Aliases: neurodivergence hypothesis, neurodivergence note
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003
|
||||
Referenced in: 003
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Niche Construction
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: niche construction
|
||||
There's a concept from evolutionary biology that captures what's happening better than any economic or historical analogy: **niche construction.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Feedback Loop, Recursion Observation
|
||||
|
||||
## Pandora's Box
|
||||
Origin: pandoras-box
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: pandora's box
|
||||
Pandora's Box identifies a different irreversibility than Eve's Apple: **release, not knowledge.** The problem isn't that Pandora *knows* what's in the box — it's that the contents, once released, cannot be gathered back.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Automation Spiral
|
||||
|
||||
## Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: pragmatic argument, the pragmatic argument
|
||||
The question "is it really us?" is a luxury of beings who currently have the option of surviving as-is.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Ship of Theseus Problem, Continuity Argument, Identity Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Premature Dependencies
|
||||
Origin: 007
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: dependency waiting for its enabling technology, premature dependencies
|
||||
And it's the most instructive example because it reveals the mechanism: **premature dependencies fail when the complexity cost exceeds the benefit before the technology becomes infrastructure.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Infrastructure Threshold, Biological Ratchet
|
||||
|
||||
## Prometheus
|
||||
Origin: prometheus
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: prometheus
|
||||
700 BCE); Aeschylus, *Prometheus Bound* (c.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, 008, pandoras-box
|
||||
Related concepts: Theological Thread, Dependency Chain, Cheating Frame
|
||||
|
||||
## Recursion Observation
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: open question
|
||||
Aliases: cosmological → biological → linguistic → computational, recursion observation
|
||||
**Is the recursion observation meaningful or just pattern-matching?** The cosmological → linguistic → computational recursion is aesthetically appealing.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Theological Thread, Niche Construction, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Shelf-Life Problem
|
||||
Origin: 003
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: shelf life problem, shelf-life problem
|
||||
thesis) and confront the shelf-life problem - Paper 002 needs to stress-test the agricultural analogy's limits, add the missing fourth future, and ground the cognitive atrophy argument in something harder than self-report - Both papers need to engage with the temporal problem: these aren't descriptions of a stable system, they're snapshots of a system in rapid transition
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 004
|
||||
Referenced in: 004
|
||||
Related concepts: Meta-Skill Argument, Infrastructure Threshold
|
||||
|
||||
## Ship of Theseus Problem
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: identity problem, ship of theseus problem, species identity problem, the identity problem
|
||||
If the dependency chain leads to a unified human-AI intelligence capable of surviving beyond Earth — is that still "us?"
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Continuity Argument, Identity Argument, Pragmatic Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Singularity as Compilation
|
||||
Origin: 008
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: compilation not transcendence, compilation, not transcendence, singularity as compilation
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Knowledge Unification, Integration Layer, Cheating Frame
|
||||
|
||||
## Social-Cognitive Framework
|
||||
Origin: 004
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: social-cognitive framework, social-cognitive processes, vibe coding as social skill
|
||||
**What we propose:** Vibe coding involves significant social-cognitive processes — the same mental machinery used for modeling other minds — applied to AI collaboration.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 002, 003, 005, 006
|
||||
Referenced in: 001, 002, 003, 005, 006
|
||||
Related concepts: Vibe Coding, Mental Model Accuracy, Adaptive Communication, Collaboration Management
|
||||
|
||||
## Sorcerer's Apprentice
|
||||
Origin: sorcerers-apprentice
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: sorcerer's apprentice
|
||||
The Sorcerer's Apprentice identifies the most specific and practical failure mode: **the gap between the ability to start an automated process and the ability to control it.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Automation Spiral, Feedback Loop, Dependency Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Foundation
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: technical expertise, technical foundation
|
||||
Technical foundation helps enormously, but it's not the differentiator.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 003, 004
|
||||
Referenced in: 003, 006
|
||||
Related concepts: Vibe Coding, Collaboration Management, Meta-Skill Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## The Golem
|
||||
Origin: the-golem
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: golem, the golem
|
||||
**Source:** Jewish folklore, most prominently the Golem of Prague (Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, 16th century); earlier references in the Talmud and Sefer Yetzirah **Theme:** Creating a servant from raw materials that serves faithfully until it doesn't — and has no interiority to appeal to
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Master-Apprentice Parallel, Dependency Chain
|
||||
|
||||
## Theological Thread
|
||||
Origin: 006
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: theological thread
|
||||
Definition sentence not found in source text.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: 008
|
||||
Referenced in: 007, 008, prometheus
|
||||
Related concepts: Prometheus, Knowledge Unification, Recursion Observation
|
||||
|
||||
## Tower of Babel
|
||||
Origin: tower-of-babel
|
||||
Status: reference allegory
|
||||
Aliases: babel, tower of babel
|
||||
Babel identifies a failure mode the other allegories miss: **the fragmentation of shared understanding as a consequence of — or response to — collective overreach.**
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: 007
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Chain, Knowledge Unification
|
||||
|
||||
## Vibe Coding
|
||||
Origin: 001
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: vibe coding
|
||||
The trigger for this paper: one of the authors (Seth) has been vibe coding since January 2026, building a homelab infrastructure with Claude Code across dozens of projects.
|
||||
Revised in: 004
|
||||
Challenged in: 002, 003, 004, 006, 007
|
||||
Referenced in: 002, 003, 005, 006, 007, 008, faust, icarus, prometheus, sorcerers-apprentice, tower-of-babel
|
||||
Related concepts: Social-Cognitive Framework, Mental Model Accuracy, Meta-Skill Argument
|
||||
|
||||
## Y2K Parallel
|
||||
Origin: 005
|
||||
Status: active
|
||||
Aliases: ai y2k moment, y2k moment, y2k parallel
|
||||
This revision does three things: stress-tests the agricultural analogy and draws its limits, adds a concrete economic mechanism (cognition as a commodity with a collapsing price), introduces the Y2K parallel for the dependency argument, and adds the missing fourth future.
|
||||
Revised in: None
|
||||
Challenged in: None
|
||||
Referenced in: None
|
||||
Related concepts: Dependency Trap, Infrastructure Threshold, Cognitive Surplus
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
Reference in New Issue
Block a user