docs: enhance papers 005 and 006

005: Add "When Does the Economy Restructure to Be Fair?" section —
     historical pattern of pain-before-reform, fairness as political
     project not technological inevitability.

006: Expand master-apprentice analogy — guild dynamics, infinite
     scaling, unmanaged displacement, collaboration as the mechanism
     of replacement.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

005-the-cognitive-surplus-revised.md

@@ -81,6 +81,26 @@ This is the critical dynamic. Breaking it apart:
 
 **The restructuring question: who benefits?** When manufacturing got cheap, consumers benefited (cheaper goods) and factory owners benefited (higher margins). Workers initially suffered (displacement, wage depression) and only benefited later, after unions, regulation, and new skill development created new equilibria. The same pattern is likely for cognitive price collapse: immediate benefit to consumers and AI-capital owners, delayed and contested benefit to cognitive workers.
 
+### When Does the Economy Restructure to Be Fair?
+
+Seth's question cuts to the core: in an economy increasingly controlled by cognition, when does the restructuring become even *somewhat* fair?
+
+The historical answer is blunt: **only when people fight for it, and usually only after visible suffering forces the issue.**
+
+Every major economic restructuring follows the same pattern. The technology arrives. Early adopters and capital owners capture the surplus. Workers are displaced or devalued. The pain becomes visible. *Then* — not before — institutions respond. Labor organizing. Regulation. Redistribution. New social contracts. But these responses are always reactive, always late, and always contested by those who benefit from the existing arrangement.
+
+- The Industrial Revolution created factory wealth in the 1780s. Factory workers didn't get meaningful legal protections until the Factory Acts of the 1830s-1840s — fifty years of child labor, 16-hour days, and industrial injuries before institutions caught up.
+- The agricultural Green Revolution increased global food production in the 1960s. Equitable distribution of that surplus is *still* incomplete sixty years later.
+- The internet democratized information in the 1990s. Platform monopolies captured most of the value. Regulatory responses (GDPR, antitrust actions) didn't begin in earnest until the 2010s — two decades of lag.
+
+The pattern predicts what will happen with cognitive price collapse: AI-capital owners and skilled early adopters will capture the surplus first. Cognitive workers will be displaced or devalued. The pain will become visible through unemployment, inequality, or a dependency crisis (the Y2K moment). *Then* institutions will respond — with AI literacy programs, compute access regulation, cognitive worker protections, or redistribution mechanisms we can't yet name.
+
+The uncomfortable implication: fairness doesn't emerge from the technology. It doesn't emerge from the market. It emerges from political struggle, and political struggle requires visible suffering as fuel. The question isn't "when does the economy restructure to be fair?" The question is "how much pain is required before the restructuring begins, and who bears that pain?"
+
+There is no mechanism — none, in all of economic history — by which a commodity price collapse automatically and smoothly redistributes its benefits. Every time, the benefits concentrate first and redistribute later, if at all. Anyone telling you AI will naturally democratize prosperity is either ignorant of history or selling something.
+
+This doesn't mean fairness is impossible. It means fairness is a *political project*, not a technological inevitability. And it means the people building on open foundations, documenting the skills, and making the economics visible (see "What to Build" below) aren't just doing technical work — they're laying groundwork for the political struggle that's coming.
+
 ### Information and Cognition as Resources
 
 Seth's hierarchy: "Information is the most valuable resource in the world. The second most valuable resource is the raw ingredient to information: cognition."